Showing posts with label editing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label editing. Show all posts

Saturday, April 3, 2010

phati'tude Literary Magazine looking for co-editor



Just got this from one of my Facebook friends, Lorraine Miller, who asked me to pass it along on my blog:

phati'tude Literary Magazine is looking for a co-editor for its quarterly publication. This is an exciting opportunity to be a part of contemporary literature.

phati’tude Literary Magazine was founded in 1997 and is published by The Intercultural Alliance of Artists and Scholars, Inc. (IAAS), a NY-based nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization. phati’tude is an attractive quarterly that publishes poetry, fiction and essays written by both emerging and established writers of diverse origins whose works exhibit social, political and cultural awareness.

The part-time, role of co-editor will include: proofreading submissions, collaborating in the selection process, and writing a book review column. You will work closely with the editor and founder of phati’tude. While the position is nonpaying (at this time), as we grow and obtain funding, we hope at some point to provide a stipend for your services. In the meantime, it is a "labor of love" that will keep you abreast with some of the hottest, award-winning writers on the literary scene today. To learn more about phati’tude Literary Magazine, go to http://phatitude.org/online/programs/phatitude-magazine/submission-guidelines.

If interested please email: editor@phatliterature.org (subject: co-editor).

With appreciation,

Lorraine Miller
Art Director, phati'tude Literary Magazine



Bookmark and Share

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Dear Mike: How do you handle rejection?



Mike: I handle it like most, if not all writers: Not very well.

I despair.

I curl up on my couch and wolf down a pint of Häagen-Dazs butter pecan ice cream.

And I endlessly go over and over in my head: What did I do wrong? How could I have done the story better? Do I really suck? Should I try another profession

But you should remember that sometimes the rejection has absolutely nothing to do with you the writer.

It’s merely the individual taste of the editor. And, believe me when I tell you this, some editors have NO TASTE. Or talent. Or writing ability. I can count on one hand the great editors I've had over my career.

So do yourself a big favor and try hard not to take rejection personally. Don’t dwell on it.

No matter how crushing it is, move beyond it. Don’t let it paralyze you. Get right back on that horse and begin riding again, even with the same project but maybe with another publication. Or star anew on another project.

Assume the law-of-averages attitude of sales people: They doesn’t get down after a rejection. They simply know they're that much closer to a sale.

Good luck! And keep the faith!



Please check out Debbie Ridpath Ohi's wonderful site:
http://www.inkygirl.com/
Click here





Bookmark and Share

Inspiration for Writers


Our compassionate and thorough manuscript edit and critique will give your prose the polish it needs to shine above the others. We offer a detailed line edit, content edit, overview critique, and unlimited follow-up conversations.
http://www.inspirationforwriters.com/editing/services.html
Free sample edit of the first 500 words of your book-length work.





Bookmark and Share

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Announcements


FREE Article-Writing Course Orientation taught by 35-year veteran writer and author, Patricia Fry. Learn how to establish an article-writing career. Promote your nonfiction book through magazine articles. First lesson of this 6-week online article-writing course FREE—no obligation to sign up. For more information: http://www.matilijapress.com/course_magarticles.htm. Click here Questions? PLFry620@yahoo.com
*****************************************
Want to get a FREE Writer’s Relief letter opener to keep you motivated as you receive responses from agents and editors? If so, post one of our fun writer’s badges on your Web site! For more details, visit http://www.WritersReliefBlog.com/page/badges.aspx.Click here
******************************************
Reliable editing, proofreading, and translation services. Discounts for Writers. Send your texts for a free quote at spanisheditingservices@gmail.com. Visit us at: www.spanisheditingservicesnyc.com Click here
******************************************
Subscribe to SPAWN’s FREE enewsletter, SPAWNews and receive a FREE ebook, 25 Ways to Promote Yourself Whether You’re an Artist, Author or Small Publisher. SPAWN is Small Publishers, Artists and Writers Network. http://www.spawn.org. Click here
******************************************
Sarky Arts www.Sarkyarts.com Click here an internet relay chat server and a branch of www.BentMindProductions.com has opened chat rooms for artists. It is a free server, and open haven for artists to discuss their work, and make connections. We have rooms assigned for musicians, writers, and artists. If you enjoy open meetings with authors and book publishers, we hold live interviews periodically so you can ask advice on publishing and writing. In the near future we will be doing the same for recording artists. Previous interviews http://www.exodusnight.com/forum/ Click here

We are easy to connect to and FREE, just go to www.SarkyArts.com and click the java link. The java chat will bring you to a room called ExodusNightOOC which is our out of character chat room for our medieval fantasy game on the server. We sometimes just chat there too, if the server is slow.
***************************************
Rebecca Williamson, former managing editor of Hampton Roads Publishing, Inc., invites writers to check out her website at www.beckthebibliophile.com.Click here
“I offer a full line of services to writers,” says Williamson. Services include
• Manuscript evaluation
• Copyediting
• Content editing: Copyediting plus detailed review of structure and content
• ESL editing
• Book doctoring
• Submissions and marketing material
“I have worked with authors who have many published books to their credit, but there is a special place in my heart for the first-time author,” says Williamson.
“Among the hundred-plus authors I have worked with are Neale Donald Walsh (this author’s Conversations with God occupied the New York Times Bestseller List for more than two and one-half years), T. J. MacGregor (she won the Edgar Award in 2002), and Roseanne Farano (popular lecturer and author of The Dove in Downward Flight and For the Sake of the Children).”





Bookmark and Share

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Inspiration for Writers


Inspiration for Writers

Our compassionate and thorough manuscript edit and critique will give your prose the polish it needs to shine above the others. We offer a detailed line edit, content edit, overview critique, and unlimited follow-up conversations.

http://www.inspirationforwriters.com/editing/services.html Click here

Free sample edit of the first 500 words of your book-length work.





Bookmark and Share

Spotlight Interview from the Archives: Susan Pocharski

Susan Pocharski, Magazine Editor

Ladies’ Home Journal Entertainment Director Susan Pocharski has been one of the top women editors in the magazine industry for last two decades. I can also tell you from firsthand experience, having her as my personal editor at the now-defunct Maximum Golf, she’s one of the most gifted ones I’ve ever worked with.

In her career, she’s been the Executive Editor at Teen People, US, and George (another long-defunct mag); a Senior Editor at People; and the Articles Editor at LIFE. As a writer, her cover stories have been featured on Entertainment Tonight and Extra, among other news magazine shows.

The following is my exclusive interview with Susan.

Mike: What do you think is the most common misconception writers have about editors?

Pocharski: That the editor knows exactly where they want a story to go. In my experience, editors sometimes look to their writers to take the story in an unexpected—and welcomed—direction. They story is improved because the writer took the story further than its original conception.

Mike: What’s the best advice you can give inexperienced writers trying to break through, either as a freelancer or staffer?

Pocharski: Wow, that's a tough one, actually, but I think the big thing is to take chances. To write A LOT, to write about different things: so you don't lock yourself in as a “travel writer” or “celebrity profiler” or whatever. That you work on being a versatile writer. Also, that you look for the unexpected stories. Find stories to pitch that your editor couldn't possibly say “no” to. Dig deep in terms of story ideas. That's the key.

Mike: What’s the best way to query and what makes a great query letter?

Pocharski: Email is best. Snail mail gets buried. In terms of what makes a great pitch: see my response above....if you’re pitching a personality profile, pitch a story that has NEVER BEEN DONE on that person. Bottomline, your pitch HAS TO BRING SOMETHING NEW TO THE TABLE.

To be honest, though, I never once assigned a story off of a pitch letter. Scary, huh?

Mike: Tell your most entertaining (and if you can, illustrative) story about being an editor

Pocharski: I changed one word of a famous writer’s essay without telling her (by mistake, of course) and she went ballistic on me. Lesson learned: always run final copy by your writer.

Mike: What should the relationship between writer and editor be at its best?

Pocharski: Collaborative. An editor who respects the writer's talent combined with a writer who respects the editor's talent.

Mike: What’s the best way for a novice writer to approach an editor, get his/her attention?

Pocharski: Again, bring them an idea they can't turn down. And, of course, being a lively, smart, thorough writer.

Mike: What are editors looking for from writers?

Pocharski: Voice. A unique voice and a strong storyteller.

Mike: How do you define great writing?

Pocharski: Something you don't want to stop reading.

Mike: What does an editor do?

Pocharski: Guide a piece and the writer.





Bookmark and Share

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Online Course: How To Be Your Own Best Fiction Editor

HOW TO BE YOUR OWN BEST FICTION EDITOR Online Course
http://tinyurl.com/PennwritersCourse200910
Click here

INSTRUCTOR: Lisa Kastner
DATE: October 1-24, 2009
COST: $25 ($30 non-Pennwriters)

Learn to easily analyze characters & plots like a pro, new ways to look at your writing with fresh eyes. Save time & rejection. Revise your story like an editor & get it published fast.





Bookmark and Share

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Spotlight Interview: Dave Herndon/Part 1


Dave Herndon, Editor/Writer

Whether he’s writing or editing, Dave Herndon is all about passion and exotic adventure—which makes him the perfect fit for his current position as Editor in Chief of Caribbean Travel & Life.

In an incredibly rich, varied career, he’s been a Features Editor/Writer/Critic for the New York daily newspaper Newsday; Managing Editor for The Village Voice; Senior Editor for Travel & Leisure; Features Editor for Sports Afield; Contributing Editor for Martha Stewart Living, as well as, I must add, one of the most important people in my writing life.

When he was the Sports Editor of the Voice in the mid 1980’s, he gave me the enormous break of my own column, Mike Geffner’s Rundown, which I wrote for the next 12 years. But, just as importantly, he taught me how to be a better writer. I will forever be indebted to him for that.

The following is the first part of my exclusive newsletter interview with Dave:

Mike: Who were your early writing influences?

Herndon: Like many who went to college in the 70’s, my writing style probably suffered for a long time from the influence of Hunter Thompson’s and Tom Wolfe’s books and articles from that era.

For a long while I used to travel with a copy of Rilke's “Letters to a Young Poet,” which young writers might benefit from, as they are about life lessons that apply to work, among other realms.

Mike: What are the most common misconceptions writers have about editors?

Herndon: That they la-di-da around all day, then suddenly make you start jumping through hoops to make up for their slackness/indecision/capriciousness. This is only partly true.

Mike: What’s the best advice you can give inexperienced writers trying to break through, or writers with some experience looking get to the next level?

Herndon: Make yourself useful. Hit your deadlines. Produce clean copy. Write thorough sidebars. Help editors solve their problems. Be willing to do grunt work (i.e. service shorts).

Mike: What simple plan can you give someone trying to make writing a career?

Herndon: Develop a specialty. Become the go-to person for some niche of
coverage, preferably something uncrowded, that you're passionate about and there's enough of a market for, or an emerging market for (e.g, over the last couple decades: fitness, technology, fringe sports going mainstream, like mountain biking, etc.). Don't turn up your nose at service writing.

Mike: Which easier—writing or editing?

Herndon: It's easier to make a living as an editor—more jobs. Freelancing is hell, and getting more hellish all the time. Try to find a mix—an editing job where you can also write, or a part-time/flextime editing job that covers the nut, has benefits, and leaves time for freelancing.

I wouldn't now recommend newspapers as a stable writing platform. I don't know what I would recommend, frankly, because things are changing so fast.



Bookmark and Share

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Ann Bogle: Tighten, Tighten, Tighten


Tighten, Tighten, Tighten
By Ann Bogle

Cut unnecessary words.

Sometimes setting a maximum length for a piece of writing is the parameter that will help you begin to notice extra wordage. I’ll set the maximum word count for this column at 300 then demonstrate cuts using this paragraph. It’s all right to write freely prior to cutting text. Cutting wordage changes rhythm so it is important to decide whether rhythm as you first lay it down matters more than concision, and it may. Repetition facilitates music. On the other hand, concision communicates certainty and irrefutability: What you have written is irreducible to every eye.

Word count of foregoing paragraph: 95. Let’s see where we can shave 40 words:

You will notice extra wordage when you set a maximum word count. The target length for this paragraph is 55 words. Write freely prior to cutting. Be aware that tighter writing may be less fluid than writing that takes its time or repeats itself. Repetition facilitates music. Concision communicates certainty. What you write becomes irreducible.

Use all you know in as short a space as possible.

If your character is paying for onions, think of cash, budgets, and soup, of the smell of onions frying, of rotten onions, of onion on the breath and fingertips, of tearing up at peeling onions. Think of the varieties and colors of onions, onions’ uses, regions where onions grow, trade history. Assume your character and audience know what you know about onions. Look at the word “onion” in various dictionaries. Think of occurrences of onions in literature and history. Think of this writing as one of those occurrences: What can add at this moment to the literature about onions? Assume there may never be a better opportunity to discover the onion. The time for what you know is now.

Ann Bogle has published short stories, prose, and poetry in many literary journals in print and online. For a listing of her publications and a sampling of her writing visit Ana Verse at:

http://annbogle.blogspot.com
Click here




Bookmark and Share

Saturday, August 15, 2009

Spotlight Interview: John Capouya


John Capouya, Magazine/Newspaper Editor/Author/Writer/Professor

John Capouya comes from publishing royalty—the son of Emile Capouya, a renowned novelist, editor, publisher, poet, and translator. John began his career as a Senior Editor for the now-defunct Sport magazine. He then worked for two top daily newspapers in New York City, as the Features Editor for New York Newsday, and both the Deputy Editor and Lead Editor of the New York Times Sunday Styles section. Moving on to big-time national magazines, he was the Lifestyle Editor of Newsweek and the Deputy Editor of Smart Money.

He has written two books, Real Men Do Yoga and Gorgeous George, and is currently a professor of journalism and writing at the University of Tampa.

Here is my exclusive newsletter interview with Mr. Capouya:

Mike: How did you get your start in journalism?

Capouya: I graduated from the Columbia J-school in 1981 and then became an editorial assistant at Sport magazine. I was there for about four years and I worked my way up to a senior editor position. It was a great experience. There were a lot of talented people there, including David Granger, who is now the editor of Esquire, and David Bauer, who’s a top editor at Sports Illustrated.

After I left Sport as a staffer, I signed on to write a certain number of freelance stories a year for them. I did that for two-and-a-half years, mostly writing about pro basketball. I found freelancing enjoyable but a very tough go financially.

I had a chance to edit again, when a good friend of mine, John Atwood, was starting up a regional magazine called Long Island Monthly (which is defunct as well), and I stayed on the editing track for a long time after that.

Mike: What’s the difference between being a writer and being an editor?

Capouya: Earlier in my career, I found writing to be an agonizing, nerve-wracking process. I would stay up all night and rewrite endlessly and probably fruitlessly. With the editing, I got to use my intellect and it wasn't so much of a neurotic process.

Mike: What are the most common misconceptions that writers have about editors?

Capouya: Well, lately, I've felt that writers filing stories to me expected major intervention. That it wasn’t just inevitable but even a desirable part of the process—not only to me but the magazine for which I’m editing. As a result, I feel like I've been getting intentionally or consciously overlong drafts, or works in progress. The underlying assumption seems to be that I am going to do major work on it anyway, so crafting the story to the agreed-upon length isn’t really necessary. In my worst moments, it feels like the writers are saying: ‘Okay, here is what I gathered. You figure out what you want and how to make it into a story,’ which is emphatically not what I want to do.

To be fair, my experiences as a writer of late have shown me that, even if my editor doesn’t tear into my copy, his or her top editor, the editor in chief sometimes will, so writers expecting this are not necessarily wrong. I still think it’s incumbent on you to shape and finish a story to completion, to deliver a finished product to the extent that you can.

It's a tricky and at times uncomfortable position to be in, as a story editor, to encourage and guide a writer to revise and improve a draft, when it’s never certain that the top editor—or at times, editors—will agree with the guidance I've given. I don’t know what the answer is. I can only do what my experience and sense of what the top editor wants tell me what is needed and hope I am not steering the writer wrong.

Mike: What can you tell us about query letters?

Capouya: I’d say the most common, and maybe most annoying mistakes are writers not reading and/or not understanding the magazine, sending queries that either a) we’ve already done, b) our main competitors just did and which we therefore would not want to pursue, or c) perfectly good stories but that clearly don’t fit into the publication's mission.

E-mailing queries is probably the best approach right now. Although no matter how you send them, it can often take forever to be read.

My only advice about that waiting period: Don’t wait! That is, have other ideas out to other people. After a couple of weeks, go back to the editor you queried and ask if they had a chance to read it yet, can they tell you if there’s any interest, and if not you want to pitch it elsewhere.

Mike: What should the relationship between writer and editor be at best?

Capouya: The writer and editor should discuss the story fully beforehand what’s needed and how to get it, even some sources that might be approached or possible structures for the piece (especially for service pieces).

The writer should then take the ball and run with it, giving the occasional update and especially notifying the editor if the story is not going as planned. Once the writer files (on time and near the agreed-upon word count, of course), the editor’s role is ideally finding ways—such as structure, phrasing, point-making—that make an already good story a little better, and again, ideally, the writer sees and agrees that these suggestions will work.

Unlike some editors, I don’t want to engage in “hand-holding” or to be a source of emotional support for volatile or needy writers. My view is, this is a business, albeit one in which a lot of feelings and emotions come into play, since the creative process is by definition an intensely personal thing, and that this should be conducted in a cordial but essentially business-like fashion.

Mike: What’s the best way for a novice writer to approach an editor, get his/her attention?

Capouya: It helps to come recommended by someone I know, or simply to have an idea that will force me to take a chance on you because it’s such a good story.

Mike: What are editors looking for from writers?

Capouya: Ideas, dependability, agreeable as opposed to diva-ish vibe. And best of all, to surprise with the quality and originality of your work and insights and/or writing skills, surpassing the minimum acceptable level of the completed assignment.

Mike: How do print magazine editors view online clips and/or self-published book authors?

Capouya: Online clips, self-published books are fine, I think. How they’re viewed within the industry shouldn’t depend on the medium in which they were published but the quality of the writing. Good writing, no matter where it’s published, will get noticed.



Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Hostile Editing: Resources for the Toughest Writing Jobs


Hostile Editing can help you achieve your communication goals with its powerful, strategic guides: "100 Days to Better Writing," "Precise Edit Training Manual," "Writing Tips for a Year," and "Bang! Writing with Impact." You don’t need an English degree to write well; you need to GET HOSTILE. Visit www.HostileEditing.com to purchase the guide you need.

http://www.hostileediting.com/
Click here



Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Editing is an Imperfect Process

Editing is an Imperfect Process
By Patricia Fry

I hate it when I discover a mistake in my already published book. There’s the book all printed and bound—etched in stone—and, oops a mistake appears. When you spot it, it’s like a big, red zit suddenly appears on the face of the book.

Embarrassing.

I don’t think there is a book of any substance anywhere without a mistake. Not that this is an excuse to go ahead and make them or to avoid all of those final pre-printing edits and proofs. I teach and preach that we must produce the most pristine product possible. But something is going to escape our eyes and those of our editors and proofreaders. It’s pretty much a given that your perfect book will arrive with a few mistakes.

You might find them right away, upon first glance—and it’s a real shame when that happens. Or it might take you days, weeks, months, even years to discover a mistake or two.

When my books arrive from the publisher/printer, I always set aside one copy to mark up. Whenever anyone points out a mistake or I spot one, I highlight it so I can correct it in the next printing.

What are your failsafe procedures for editing your book? I’ve found over the years that editing is a process. When I edit my own work, especially a book manuscript, I go over it many, many times with different things in mind. There’s the initial editing after the book is completed—sometimes involving two, three or more reads. There’s the editing work after making additions or changes. (I want to make sure I haven’t repeated something unnecessarily or that I haven’t, heaven forbid, contradicted myself.) I edit again when something jumps out at me during a random glance. I read my manuscript over and over and over again. And then I get down to the nitty gritty editing work.

I read my manuscripts with content in mind—does it make sense, does it flow, do the transitions work well, are my explanations clear, is the material pertinent, have I left anything out, are there areas where I have over-explained, what about organization?

I strive to edit out extra words—in other words, I tighten and then I tighten it some more.

I read the manuscript for accuracy. I check facts and statistics and make sure the attributions are in place and correct. Do the chapter titles and headings correspond with the table of contents? Do the fonts for chapter titles and headings, etc. conform in size and style throughout? Have I used the right words in the right places? Spell-check will not alert you to wrong words when they are spelled correctly. For example, you might intend using “carp” and it is spelled, “crap,” “have” instead of “has,” “bed” instead of “bad.” It takes an alert mind and a good eye to discover mistakes like these.

I check my manuscripts over for qualifier words such as “very.” And I watch for repeated words.

I read the manuscript from a grammatical and punctuation point of view. Are my sentences varied, are they grammatically correct, have I used one space only after all punctuation, have I caught all of the redundancies and incorrect uses of words?

And finally, I read my manuscript to make sure it is clear, even to someone from Mars. I try to explain everything from a beginner’s point of view so I’m assured that no one reading this book will be left behind.
Folks, this major editing work is your job. Your next step is to hire an editor to fine tune your manuscript. The more thorough your editing job, the more an editor can do for you. And it may take several go-throughs. While some of my clients have such clean manuscripts that it takes just one session of editing, most require my services twice.

Editing is not a once-over job that you rush through in order to meet a deadline. It is a process that can take time and should. Turn out your best work. Look at it several times with your clearest editorial eye and then hand it over to an editor who is accustomed to editing book manuscripts for a final polishing.

Patricia Fry is a full-time freelance writer and the author of 29 books. Her articles have appeared in Writer’s Digest, Entrepreneur Magazine, Cat Fancy, Your Health, The Toastmaster and many others. View her collection of books at http://www.matilijapress.com. And visit her informative publishing blog often: http://www.matilijapress.com/publishingblog.




Bookmark and Share

Monday, July 20, 2009

Precise Edit: Good Writing Always Matters


Precise Edit helps writers polish their content. We’re here for you. Whether it’s manuscripts or resumes, books or essays, Precise Edit is here to help you achieve your writing goals. Specialized services are available for authors, businesses and organizations, students, and private individuals. Visit www.PreciseEdit.com to learn more about our services.

http://www.preciseedit.com/
Click here



Bookmark and Share

Friday, July 10, 2009

Inkygirl - Editing



Please check out Debbie Ridpath Ohi's wonderful site:

http://www.inkygirl.com/
Click here




Bookmark and Share

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Inspiration for Writers Editing and Critiquing Services


Inspiration for Writers Editing and Critiquing Services

Need a writing coach? We'll polish your prose with a liberal dose of gentle guidance and professional experience. Reasonable rates, fast turnaround, ongoing communication, nice people. Now accepting self-help, memoirs and novels.

Details at:

http://www.inspirationforwriters.com/editing/services.html.
Click here

Free sample edit available.



Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

An Interesting Site I Just Discovered: Editrixie


http://www.editrixie.com/
Click here

It's an editorial service of four top-flight women editors/writers.

Here are the bios from the site:

JANET STEEN

Steen has been an editor and writer for more than fifteen years. She started on the editorial staff at Esquire, where she tweaked the prose of writers including Norman Mailer, Denis Johnson, and Mary Gaitskill. She went on to become the books editor at Time Out New York, an editor at Us Weekly, and the literary editor at Details, positions that required her to tackle towering piles of galleys and spot new literary talent. She has written about books, music, film, and other varieties of pop culture for the New York Times Book Review, Interview, Details, Us Weekly, Time Out New York, and Sports Illustrated for Women. Her profile subjects include such widely varying personalities as Steve Martin, Barry White, Martin Amis, and Dennis Hopper. As a freelance editor she has worked on everything from textbooks to pop-music anthologies. She received her M.A. in writing from Johns Hopkins University, where she studied with John Barth and Edna O'Brien and where she also taught an undergraduate course on creative writing and literature. She currently teaches a course entitled Writing about Pop Culture for Magazines for mediabistro.

REBECCA WOLFF

Wolff has an uncanny knack for the elegant sentence and its efficient placement. Wolff has been in the business of editing texts for ten years, since she was hired as Associate Editor of Gulf Coast, a literary journal out of the University of Houston. Her subsequent experience includes eight years of editing her own print journal, Fence (www.fencemag.com), and in her private consultancy helping many poets, fiction writers, and average everyday citizens shape their manuscripts and texts. Her copyediting and proofreading clients have included Artforum, Bookforum, Esquire, Fodor's Travel Guides, PenguinPutnam, Publishers Weekly, Thunder's Mouth Press, the Whitney Museum of Contemporary American Art, and numerous others. She has edited everything from travel guides to curriculum vitae to romance novels to slender volumes of poetry. Rebecca Wolff is herself a poet, with books published by the University of Illinois Press and W. W. Norton, and has taught courses at The New School on the art and practice of putting together poetry manuscripts. A native New Yorker (1967), her degrees are from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst (1991) and the Iowa Writers Workshop (1993).

JOANNA YAS

Yas began a career in publishing in 1997, when she was associate editor of Zoetrope: All Story. Since 1999, she has been the editor of Open City, a literary journal and book publisher, where she has edited fiction, essays, and poetry by writers such as David Berman, Sam Lipsyte, Meghan Daum, Edward St. Aubyn, James Lasdun, Alicia Erian, Robert Olen Butler, Marcelle Clements, and Nick Tosches. She also writes promotional material (catalog copy, jacket copy, pitch letters, and press releases), and is an expert publicist—her authors have received reviews in The New York Times, The Village Voice, New York Review of Books, and The Nation. She has copyedited and proofread for a variety of clients, including Grove Press and The New School, and has been a freelance editor on book projects ranging from murder mysteries to memoir. She has conducted numerous seminars on writing and publishing at The New School, Sarah Lawrence, and the University of Massachusetts, and has been an editorial consultant for Creative Capital and The Association of Alternative News Weeklies. Originally from Massachusetts, she received her BA from Hampshire College, where she studied writing and literature.

BARBARA SPINDEL

Spindel's writing and editing experience stretches from the political trenches to the halls of academia to the world of pop culture. She spent three years doing research and writing for liberal advocacy group People for the American Way before going on to complete a Ph.D. in American Studies from the University of Minnesota (where she also taught freshman composition). For the past decade, she has worked as a freelance editor and writer; she has edited and copyedited for Spin, mtv.com, and ArtForum, and her writing has appeared in Time Out New York, Details, Us Weekly, Spin, Newsweek.com, and mtv.com, in addition to a number of scholarly journals. Her B.A., in English and American Studies, is from Wesleyan University.



Bookmark and Share

Friday, February 13, 2009

Spotlight Interview: John Atwood


John Atwood, National Magazine Editor-in-Chief

John Atwood has been one of the top editors in the national magazine business for over two decades. Currently the editor-in-chief of Travel & Leisure Golf Magazine, Atwood has been the editor-in-chief of Sports Afield and, most notably, was one of the founding editors of Men’s Journal.

Here’s my exclusive newsletter interview with Mr. Atwood:

Mike: So what does an editor-in-chief of a major national magazine really do?

Atwood: You’d be amazed how little of it has to do with actual hands-on editing. In addition to my responsibilities on the editorial side, I have to work with the publishing side, the production side, the circulation side, the marketing side, the public relations, the executive level people at the magazine, our advertisers. Overseeing the editorial is only 50 percent of what I do. No more than that. This is something that usually shocks people when I tell them—unless, of course, they are, or have been, editor-in-chiefs.

Mike: Did you ever write?

Atwood: I have, but never for a living. I still write stuff from time to time, and I actually find it a lot of fun. I’ve been edited a lot too. I’ve learned a lot about writing, as well as editing, from good editing experiences.

Mike: How have writers responded to your editing over the years?

Atwood: I have found that good writers actually appreciate the editing process. Occasionally, you run into an egomaniac that has difficulties with it. But, ultimately, those aren’t writers you respect or are ones you can continue working with.

Mike: What relationship do you like to have with your writers?

Atwood: I want it to be close enough where I really know who they are as people, not just writers. When I decide to take on a new writer, the first question I’ll often say is, “So, tell me about your life.” I want to know the writer’s passions, life experiences of where he/she’s been and done, the subjects that turn him/her on. I want to know all those things way before I ever assign that person something. Once I fully understand what makes the writer tick and what he/she cares about, I know what topic or topics would be the perfect fit and what from the person’s experience would be valuable to the readers.

On the flipside, it’s not a bad idea for the writer to have a deeper understanding of the editor they’re working with too. Some editors are real line editors, wanting to go through every story sentence by sentence. Some editors are concept editors, focusing almost entirely on the ideas illustrated in the story. Editors, like all people, are very different and demand different things.

Mike: So, under ordinary circumstances, would you rather assign a story to the writer or take a pitch from the writer?

Atwood: It’s been my experience that the best ideas are the ones that come from writers, not editors. If you’re talking about narrative non-fiction, writers have the time, experience, and interest to fund the really cool stuff. They’re out there in the real world following it. We editors are indoor creatures, though that’s not to say that editors can’t come up with great ideas too.

Mike: What’s your advice on pitching to editors?

Atwood: Write about what you know. If you have a particular passion, no matter what it is, then that’s what you should be writing about. Because then you don’t have to get over the hurdle of not understanding the subject matter. When you’re starting out as a writer, make sure to pick topics that you not only know extremely well, but also look to say something new about it. Make sure you have a special, unique take that no one else can do but YOU.

Don’t just pluck something out of the blue because it’s interesting.

That’s why I’m a strong believer that young writers looking to build a long-lasting, in-demand career should take up niche writing. Having a specialty, especially an area that you might know better than most, if not everybody, has always been a good road—and with the way things are going, it might be better now more than ever, because magazines are getting narrower and narrower in focus.

Mike: What about query letters?

Atwood: I get tons of them, by both snail mail and email. And I must admit that I respond to very few. Being the editor-in-chief, I’m probably the worst person in the world to send a query letter to. My time limitations, as with most people in my position, are simply too great. Your chances are much better if you send it to another editor down on the masthead. Just make sure it’s the right editor for your pitch. That’s very important.

When I get a query letter, though, the first thing I’ll do is look at the name on it, and I only respond to those people whose reputations precede them, whose byline names I recognize. Or occasionally ones that come with a personal reference, someone I know and respect recommending them.

Mike: Okay, then, let’s assume the writer hits the right editor at the right time. At that point, what query letters work best?

Atwood: Ones that move quickly. Introduce yourself in the first graph, tell the editor who you are—but very briefly. Get right past the intro and go straight to your idea. If you want to embellish on your credentials, and why you’re the right person for the story, that’s fine—but do it at the end.

The idea is paramount. Is it something I’ve never heard of before? Or is it the same old same old? For any editor, that’s big when a writer hits you with something very different. That’ll capture an editor’s eye better than anything, trust me. But it still must come from a fairly known entity, with a good track record for delivering quality stuff. To accept even a great pitch from an unknown writer is rare at the high-level magazines. Just because you have a great idea doesn’t mean you’ll be able to successfully write about it to the standards of the publication you want to write it for. I’ll take a chance with someone every now and then, but it’s rare.

And one more last thing: Unless you’re a famous writer, keep your letter to no more than one page.

Mike: What are query letter killers?

Atwood: Number One, by far, is not understanding the publication in the least, or not being familiar with what stories the publication has run recently—a major turnoff.

You have to tailor your pitch precisely to the publication and its readers’ needs. Which means you need to care enough to read it a lot and see what it is that they do and what they have covered. Don’t waste the editor’s time with things they’ve already done to death.

Mike: So, what do you suggest for young, new, or relatively new writers to do?

Atwood: You have to start small, but at the same time dream big. Keep making the steps you know that you can make. Keep your expectations low. And keep plugging away.

So many writers, it seems, want to start out working for big magazines. That’s not the right way to go. The big general-interest titles, with few exceptions, forget about it. You’re not going to get published by them until you’ve proven yourself somewhere else. I don’t know one exception personally.

You should start out by writing for the small local newspapers and magazines. You build up your clips. You learn some skills. You develop your chops. Then, after you’ve paid your dues for awhile, you can try to get published by the bigger publications.

Some believe that beginning writers should try to publish small, front of-the-book items in big magazines to gain profile and use the name of the magazine in their resume and subsequent query letter. I’m not one of those people who think that works. At the end of the day, the item is usually so small it doesn’t really show your talent and other than the high of seeing your name in a big magazine, I’m not sure what you’re really going to get out of it.

My advice: Go in slow, gradual steps. And if you have any talent, you’ll get to the bigger publications in due time.

Rush the process and you risk having one door shut on you after the next, which will only frustrate you to no end and do nothing to nurture your developing talent.

Writing for top publications, while it can sometimes be very rewarding, can be a tough experience, with editors that really know their stuff and who will make you work hard. It’s best for you to know what you’re doing before you get to that place.

Mike: What do you think about simultaneous submissions? Are they okay, or a major no-no?

Atwood: If I were the writer, this is what I would do: send it to the magazine I’d most like to see the story in, give the editor two weeks, and then submit it somewhere else. That’s perfectly reasonable. In fact, I would write that very thing in your query letter—but I’d word it in a way that flatters the editor and the editor’s magazine. In other words, write: “This is a great story for your magazine. You’re my first choice, and I’m truly hoping that you’ll say yes. But if I don’t hear from you within 2-3 weeks, I’ll assume you’re not interested and I’ll take it somewhere else.” There’s nothing wrong with that at all.

Mike: Any final words?

Atwood: Yes, and they’re critical. You have to ask yourself again and again why you do this and whether you have the drive to go it for the long run.

I think the most common misperception is that writing and getting published are easy. They’re not. The freelance market is so impossibly difficult that most freelance writers are doing bartending or waiting or some service industry jobs to make a living. They’re forced to do other things. And the act of writing itself, for most writers, is a hundred times more painful than it is for the rest of us.

That means that if you want to do this for a living, you have to love it and want it with everything you have inside you. Because the reality is, it’s an incredibly tough life and the only thing that can overwhelm this reality is that intense desire to do it. You do it because you have to, because you want nothing else.

Believe it or not, the same is true of us editors. We have to love it—and want it—just as badly.


Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

How Editors Think


How Editors Think
By Marcela Landres

"I read How Editors Think in one sitting and was engaged from beginning to end. It is well written, highly informative, and humorous—I found myself laughing out-loud in a few spots! Thanks for sharing the secrets of the trade."—Maryra Lazara Dole, author of Down to the Bone

Inspired by my experience as a former Simon & Schuster editor, How Editors Think: The Real Reason They Rejected You reveals what it really takes to get published. For more information, visit:

http://www.marcelalandres.com/E-book.html
Click here


Bookmark and Share

Sunday, February 8, 2009

Spotlight Interview: Marcela Landres


Marcela Landres, Author, Book Editor/Writing Teacher & Consultant/Motivational Speaker

Before starting her own business as a freelance editorial consultant, both guiding aspiring writers through the publishing process and helping them develop winning career strategies, Marcela Landres worked for seven years as an acquisitions editor for Simon & Schuster.

During her tenure at S&S, in which she was one of the scant few Latino editors in major book publishing, Ms. Landres acquired and edited the likes of best-selling authors Karen Rauch Carter and Dora Levy Mossanen, as well as oversaw the award-winning Spanish language division Libros en Español.

She’s on the Literature Panel for the New York State Council on the Arts; a judge for the Beyond Margins Award for PEN, the Latino Book Awards, and The Scholastic Art & Writing Award; and a member of the Women's Media Group, New York Women in Communications, and Las Comadres.

In addition to her consulting business, Landres has authored the book, “How Editors Think: The Real Reason They Rejected You” and runs a popular workshop called “How to Write a Knockout Book Proposal,” speaks before such organizations as The Learning Annex, Columbia University, the National Writers Union and the National Association of Latino Arts and Culture, and publishes Latinidad, a newsletter for Latino writers.

Please check out her Web site at:

http://www.marcelalandres.com/
Click here

And her Yahoo group at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/marcelalandres/
Click here

And feel free to contact her at:

marcelalandres@yahoo.com

Here is my exclusive newsletter interview with Ms. Landres:

Mike: What was your childhood like? Were you born to be in book publishing?

Landres: No, far from it. I grew up the daughter of Ecuadorian immigrants in the projects of Long Island City, Queens in New York City. My dad was a fireman and my mom was a schoolteacher, and neither of them were readers. In fact, we didn’t have any books in our home while I was growing up.

Mike: So, where did your love of books come from?

Landres: When you’re the child of a schoolteacher you must be a straight-A student—that’s the expectation—and my mother went about that by teaching me how to read at a very young age. I don’t think her intention was to make me a book lover, but learning to read very early certainly struck something inside me.

Plus, we lived across the street from a small public library and by the time I was 10 I was coming home with stacks of books. I started reading books written by authors whose last names began with the letter “A” and worked my way from there.

In addition, my father is an old-school Latino, so my sisters and I couldn’t date until we were 18. We couldn’t go to parties. We couldn’t throw parties. We couldn’t go to friends’ houses and play. We lead very sheltered lives. All I had was TV and books, and, although I watched a lot of TV, I was mostly a book nerd—and proud of it. Books like Charles Dickens’ Nicholas Nickleby and Betty Smith’s A Tree Grows in Brooklyn—these were my first best friends. Writers were my heroes because their stories opened up my otherwise circumscribed world.

I had no desire to hang out on the streets with the other kids. I was a loner and painfully shy. My mother used to snatch books out of my hands in the summer, and order me to go outside. And she’d come into my room at nighttime, when I was supposed to be asleep, and order me to stop reading by moonlight. Needless to say, it didn’t work!

Mike: Did you study publishing or literature in college?

Landres: Not right away. Originally, I was on the pre-med track, because I was supposed to become the first doctor in my family. But that ended once I got to organic chemistry lab. I quickly switched to English Lit and never looked back.

Mike: What was your route to Simon & Schuster?

Landres: I’d done some book publishing internships while in college. But I’d heard that magazines promoted faster and paid more, so I gave magazines a chance and worked for The American Lawyer for a year-and-a-half as the assistant to the editor and publisher. But my heart wasn’t in magazines. I didn’t love them nearly as much as I did books. So I left there to join Simon & Schuster.

Mike: What was your job at S&S exactly?

Landres: My main function was to read proposals and manuscripts and to separate them into two piles: “reject” and “pursue.” The fact is I put almost all of them into the rejection pile. The very few I didn’t I did my best to put under contract.

In essence, I was the gateway to a book being published.

I did very little reading in the office. Most of it was done at home, on the weekends, or on the subway ride to and from work. In fact, my decision to accept or reject something was often made on the subway.

Mike: Did you read unrepresented submissions?

Landres: Yes, but that made me very unusual among my editing colleagues. I was very open and accepting of those submissions, mostly because I became an editor to help Latino writers get published and most Latino writers didn’t have agents. The reason for that is, most agents aren’t Latino, and to ask them to find Latino writers is an exercise in futility.

Mike: How many manuscripts would you receive daily?

Landres: From around a half-dozen to dozens.

Mike: And how many of those would you publish in a good year?

Landres: On average, around 15.

Mike: Wow! So the numbers are pretty bad?

Landres: Yes, it’s a very low percentage. The odds are heavily against you.

Mike: So, what do you suggest to writers to increase the numbers in their favor?

Landres: It’s all about your reputation and your Rolodex. Who you know is your Rolodex. Who knows you is your reputation. The person that once said, “It’s all about who you know,” was half-right. The two combined make your platform. And platform is what’s most in demand in book publishing these days.

Most editors and most agents are not primarily looking for talented writers. What we’re looking for are people with a strong platform. Look at Dr. Phil. He had a best-selling weight-loss book, yet he’s hardly a great writer, hardly a fitness expert, and hardly looks like someone who should be writing about weight loss. But he has a great platform. He’s a friend of Oprah and has a top-rated TV show. He’s a perfect example of platform meaning much more than writing talent.

Mike: What are the five best pieces of advice for aspiring writers to build a strong platform?

Landres: 1) Spend no more than 50 percent of your time being the best writer you can be and no less than 50 percent of your time learning the business of publishing. Although writing can be a hobby, a vocation, a calling, a form of artistic expression, if you expect to be published, that means you expect to be paid, so at the end of the day writing is a job. Writers who treat writing as a job have a much better chance of being successful.

2) Attend writing conferences. Specifically, choose conferences that focus on the genre in which you write. In other words, if you write horror, go to a horror writers conference. It’s a wonderful way to not only meet successful horror writers, but also to network with agents and editors who specialize in horror.

3) Get your short pieces (e.g. poems, short stories, and essays) published in literary journals, magazines, newspapers, and reputable Web sites before seeking to publish a book-length work. It’s very difficult to get a book-length work published if you haven’t had short pieces published first. You need to start developing a readership that extends well beyond your mom, best friend, and significant other.

4) Make new friends. Most unpublished writers make the mistake of only hanging out with other unpublished writers. Hanging out with other unpublished writers all the time won’t get you very far in your writing career. I’m not suggesting that you get rid of all your old friends. Keep and cherish your old friends, as you’ll need them on the way up, as well as on the way down. But you should carefully seek out new friends who are successfully published writers, and try to make them your mentors.

5) Read the author bios printed on book covers. Notice how bios invariably list highlights of a writer’s platform. How do you think they got that book deal in the first place?

Mike: What do you think of self-publishing?

Landres: I sing the praises of self-publishing. For the right writer and right kind of book, it’s been a time-proven method of launching a successful traditional writing career. All kinds of writers have done it, though it’s worked best for authors of commercial women’s fiction. African-American writers in particular have benefited from self-publishing.

E. Lynn Harris started out self-publishing and is now a huge best-selling author at Random House. Zane, a best-selling erotica author published by Simon & Schuster, also began as a self-published author. James Redfield self-published The Celestine Prophecy before it became a huge mainstream hit. And Karen E. Quinones Miller and M.J. Rose are also examples of best-selling authors who built their platforms via self-publishing. If all these people can do it, so can you.

Mike: But aren’t a lot of self-published books just plain horrible?

Landres: Sure. But most of the stuff published by traditional publishing houses is crap. So why should self-publishing be different?

Mike: Do you write yourself?

Landres: No. Just for my newsletter and Web site, though I wouldn’t even call that writing. I’m an educator, not a writer. But I’m unusual among editors that way. In my experience, most editors are repressed writers.

Mike: What do you do in your consulting business?

Landres: I work one-on-one with writers, editing their manuscript or critiquing their proposals. I tell them what’s wrong and how to fix it. But that’s just part of what I do. The other part is educating them about the business of publishing, which is as important as the craft of writing. About half of my clients have agents, and half don’t. Some write fiction, some write non-fiction. About 40% are Latino, which means 60% are not. But the one thing they pretty much all have in common is they’ve gotten really nice rejection letters from publishing companies telling them their writing or book idea is good but needs polishing. That’s where I step in. I teach them craft, and then empower them to make informed choices in their writing careers.

Mike: Could you recommend a Web site for writers other than your own?

Landres: Yes, it’s called Backspace—The Writers Place, at:

http://www.bksp.org/
Click here

Mike: Any book recommendations?

Landres: Two, actually. First, The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Getting Published by Sheree Bykofsky & Jennifer Bayse Sander. The greatest value of this book is that it includes a real live book proposal that resulted in a book deal. And the other is Publicize Your Book! An Insider’s Guide to Getting Your Book the Attention It Deserves by Jacqueline Deval. It’s a fabulous book. In fact, let me read you these first two sentences:

“The reality of book publishing is that there are too few resources to support every book. This means that some books will get publicity campaigns and budgets, while others will go without.”

That’s exactly right. This goes contrary to what most authors believe. They simply assume that their publishing company will automatically spend money promoting their book just because they published it. The reality is that’s not always the case.

Mike: Who are some of your heroes in the literary world?

Landres: Oh, god, I have so many. Toni Morrison. Terry McMillan. Charles Dickens. Annie Dillard. And a Dominican-American writer named Angie Cruz, who grew up in Washington Heights.

Mike: What inspires you?

Landres: People’s stories, either reading them or hearing them. I love storytellers.

Mike: Do you have a favorite quote?

Landres: I have a motto I live by:

If you are in a position to help someone, it is your honor and your obligation to do so.

I believe that knowledge is power only when shared. I tell my clients and everyone who attends my workshops that now that I’ve shared my knowledge with them, they better get off their butt and do something with it. I think it’s my duty to crush unrealistic expectations and replace them with achievable goals.

Mike: Any lasting thoughts?

Landres: Yes. Always remember that, whether you are published or not, we all have stories to tell, and we’re the only ones who are qualified to tell them. All of us are storytellers. Some of us simply have a greater need to share our stories and attract an audience.


Bookmark and Share